ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Effect of Personalized AI-Generated Picture Books on Anxiety During First Dental Visits in Young Children: Two Case Reports.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Personalized AI-Generated Picture Books on Anxiety During First Dental Visits in Young Children: Two Case Reports.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study tested whether a personalized picture book created using image-generation technology reduces caregivers' perceived child dental anxiety and improves cooperation during a child's first dental visit. The book is read to achieve familiarity and predictability before the visit and is synchronized with the clinical sequence. Two dentally naive toddlers were recruited from a university clinic. For each child, a device-based picture book was generated (using DALL·E 3) and tailored to the actual operation, attending dentist, and child's appearance. Caregivers read the book at home (7 days previsit). The clinical sequence was intentionally managed to mirror situations depicted in the book ensuring continuity from home preparation. The sequence included sitting on a dental chair, introducing the instrument, oral examination, and topical fluoride application. Immediately after the visit, caregivers completed an online questionnaire (1-4 scales) assessing precaregiver/postcaregiver anxiety and worry about the child crying, perceived child cooperation, perceived contribution to anxiety reduction, intention to schedule periodic checkups, and perceived reading burden with free-text feedback. Both caregivers reported lower anticipatory anxiety (pre-reading mean: 3.5; postreading mean: 2.5) and worry about the child crying (pre-reading mean: 4.0; postreading mean: 2.5). After the visit, they perceived the children to be highly cooperative (mean score: 4.0/4). Caregivers also felt that the picture book contributed to reducing their children's anxiety (mean score: 3.0/4). For the second-born child (single case), the caregiver reported lower anxiety than during the older sibling's first dental visit (score: 4/4). Caregivers' ratings of reading burden were mixed. Customized device-based picture books that mirror real clinical settings and are synchronized with actual clinical visits appear feasible and acceptable for toddlers' first dental visits. By offering familiar, concrete cues and a simple "what happens next" script, this approach may help mitigate negative expectations, support cooperation, and be adaptable to routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.