Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207236›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Automated identification of MRI series using a hierarchical modular machine-learning pipeline.

Mariusz J Kujawa, Matías Fernández-Patón, Leonor Cerdá Alberich, Diana Veiga-Canuto, Luis Martí-Bonmatí

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariusz J KujawaGrupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen (GIBI230), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain. mariusz.kujawa@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4654-4321
Matías Fernández-PatónGrupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen (GIBI230), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9374-1411
Leonor Cerdá AlberichGrupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen (GIBI230), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-4278
Diana Veiga-CanutoGrupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen (GIBI230), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-2940
Luis Martí-BonmatíGrupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen (GIBI230), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8234-010X

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 826494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe volume and diversity of large MR imaging datasets require efficient automated labelling tools for cataloguing MR series, as manual annotation is impractical and costly. However, relying on DICOM header fields alone is unreliable because sequence descriptors are heterogeneous and locally defined, frequently missing or incorrect, and may be altered or removed during anonymisation. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed an AI-based modular model to classify MR series. The pipeline comprises five sequential classifiers (Family, Weighting, Fat Suppression, Contrast, and Others) and was trained and tested on 18,181 MRI series from the multicentre PRIMAGE repository. The dataset was split by patient into 80% training/validation and 20% testing; within the training/validation subset, five-fold cross-validation was used. With the exception of contrast classification, all modules used DICOM tag-based machine learning models (CatBoost/Random Forest), while the Contrast classifier incorporated image analysis using a pretrained single-slice ResNet-50. Ethical approval for the study was obtained.

resultsAccuracy was 0.994 for Weighting, 0.984 for Family, 0.959 for Fat suppression and 0.958 for Others; the Contrast classifier recorded 0.841. Overall, the end-to-end classification yielded a weighted F1 of 0.849 (CI: 0.837-0.861) and an accuracy of 0.853 (CI: 0.841-0.865).

conclusionThe proposed approach provides a reliable and scalable solution for labelling large, heterogeneous MRI datasets across multiple anatomical regions. The pipeline achieved excellent performance for Weighting and Family classification, solid performance for Fat Suppression and 'Others'. However, Contrast classification remains the main limitation and warrants further refinement and/or additional modules. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Reliable, automated MRI sequence labelling enables faster, reproducible cohort selection and protocol harmonisation in large archives, supporting downstream clinical research and AI tools while reducing manual curation effort and error. KEY POINTS: Multicentre PRIMAGE cohort (18,181 MR series) enabling evaluation in a heterogeneous setting. Machine learning model combining DICOM metadata and image features. High accuracy in series classification: up to 0.994 on key tasks. A scalable pipeline reduces manual annotation workload for radiologists.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingClassification AlgorithmsHumansArtificial intelligenceDICOMMagnetic resonance imagingMulticentre studySeries classification

Identifiers

PMID42207236
PMCPMC13219728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.