ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Intestinal microbiome in necrotic enteritis infection of broiler and comparison of treatment alternatives.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clostridium perfringens is the primary causative agent of necrotic enteritis (NE), a gastrointestinal disease that leads to substantial economic losses in poultry. This study aims to characterize the intestinal microbiome of chickens and assess the effects of Bacillus velezensis on gut microbiota and recovery from necrotic enteritis, comparing its efficacy to antibiotic treatment. The experiment involved five groups, each consisting of 16 chickens. The first group, the start-of-challenge (DB) group, included day-old chicks. The second group, the post-challenge control (DS) group, was reared until the end of the trial. The third group was infected with C. perfringens (NE group). The fourth group received both C. perfringens and B. velezensis (BV group), while the fifth group was treated with C. perfringens and amoxicillin (AB group). All chickens were euthanized via cervical dislocation following the experimental infection. Fecal samples collected from the cecum underwent 16 S rRNA gene-based metagenomic analysis, and the resulting data were statistically evaluated. Macroscopic examination after euthanasia revealed pathological changes in the intestines of chickens in the NE group, which had received only C. perfringens. Their intestines appeared swollen, with slight mild mucosal hemorrhage. In contrast, no macroscopic lesions were observed in the DB, DS, BV, or AB groups. Microbiome analysis showed a decline in microbial diversity within the NE group. The BV group exhibited a microbial composition most similar to that of healthy animals, followed by the AB group. The study concludes that B. velezensis could serve as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotics in mitigating the adverse effects of necrotic enteritis on the gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207344What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.