Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207455›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026

Asthma daytime and nighttime symptom diaries: content validity and qualitative exploration of meaningful change in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Tom Keeley, Katie Forde, Hannah Elwick, Adam Gater, Sophie Lawrie, Agkreta Leventi, Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom KeeleyDigital Measures, RWDMA, Development Sciences, GSK, London, UK. tom.x.keeley@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-9093
Katie FordePatient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Hannah ElwickPatient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Adam GaterPatient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Sophie LawriePatient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Agkreta LeventiPatient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Rafael Alfonso-CristanchoGlobal Real-World Evidence and Health Outcomes Research, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma symptom severity can be assessed using the Asthma Daytime and Nighttime Symptom Diaries (ADSD and ANSD), which provide an accurate and standardized patient-reported option for symptom assessment during different periods of the day (i.e. daytime and nighttime), as these can vary significantly. Earlier development and validation work for the ADSD and ANSD was conducted in a broad (i.e. ranging from mild to severe) asthma population, and a US Food and Drug Administration qualification statement noted the need for further evaluation of their measurement properties, including content validity. The current study, which builds upon earlier work, was designed to ensure that the ADSD and ANSD are content-valid in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. METHODOLOGY: Qualitative semi-structured concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted in adults with moderate-to-severe asthma to investigate understanding of ADSD and ANSD instructions, items, recall period, response options, and concept relevance. Changes in total and item scores that were meaningful to patients were explored. General feedback on the measures was also requested.

resultsThe study recruited 15 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. Content validity findings were consistent with previous studies, supporting inclusion of six core symptoms (i.e. wheezing, cough, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and chest pain) as items in the ADSD and ANSD that occur during a typical day or night and impact upon patient well-being and functioning. A high level of understanding and relevance of the diary items to patients was demonstrated; instructions were confirmed to be easy to follow. In supportive analyses, meaningful levels of improvement on the ADSD and ANSD ranged from 0.5 to 3.5 and 0.2 to 5.0 respectively. Meanwhile, meaningful levels of worsening on the ADSD and ANSD ranged from 1.0 to 5.8 and 0.5 to 6.7 respectively.

conclusionsThe ADSD and ANSD are content-valid measures for the measurement of daytime and nighttime symptoms and their severity in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. Additional confirmatory studies are required to confirm the psychometric properties of the ADSD and ANSD in a moderate-to-severe population and to quantitatively estimate the threshold for meaningful improvement and worsening.

Indexed as

AsthmaDiaries as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSymptom AssessmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSymptom BurdenAsthma Daytime Symptom DiaryAsthma Nighttime Symptom DiaryContent validityMeaningful changeModerate asthmaPatient-reported outcomeSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID42207455
PMCPMC13219637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.