ArticlePloS one2026
Hemodynamic impact of blood viscosity in intracranial atherosclerotic arteries with varying stenosis severity: A non-newtonian computational fluid dynamics patient specific study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, yet geometric stenosis alone may not fully reflect the functional hemodynamic burden of a lesion. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with a shear-thinning non-Newtonian Carreau viscosity model to quantify the combined effects of stenosis severity and blood viscosity on intracranial hemodynamics. A middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis model with an original ~70% narrowing was reconstructed from computed tomography angiography, and additional idealized stenosis variants (30%, 50%, and 90%) were generated on the same anatomical background to enable controlled comparisons. Three viscosity states (below-normal, normal, and high) were simulated under transient, incompressible, laminar flow with rigid walls and identical boundary conditions. Velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI) and time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) were evaluated. The results show that flow behavior is governed by the combined influence of geometry and rheology, rather than by stenosis severity alone. Severe stenosis produced a dual pathological shear environment, characterized by elevated WSS within the stenotic region and disturbed low-shear flow downstream. In addition, TAWSS showed a non-monotonic response, increasing up to 70% stenosis and then decreasing at 90% stenosis. OSI also showed viscosity-dependent elevation under severe stenosis, with values ranging from approximately 0.38 to 0.48, indicating enhanced oscillatory and disturbed flow.These findings support integrating non-Newtonian hemorheology and hemodynamic metrics with geometric assessment to improve ICAS risk stratification and inform hemodynamics-guided intervention timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.