Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42208697›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2026

Development of Machine Learning Algorithms Predicting Psychological Distress After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Michelle M Ramirez, Maggie E Horn, Steven Z George, Trevor A Lentz, Theresa Coles, Gerard P Brennan, Amanda E Nelson, Kelli D Allen, Michael P Bolognesi, Maurice A Brookhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michelle M RamirezDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Maggie E HornDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Steven Z GeorgeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Trevor A LentzDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Theresa ColesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Gerard P BrennanIntermountain Healthcare, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Amanda E NelsonDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kelli D AllenDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Durham VA Healthcare Center, HSR&D Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael P BolognesiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Maurice A BrookhartDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

UNC Core Center for Clinical ResearchP30AR072580 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Amanda E Nelson · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
Mentoring in Patient Oriented Research in OsteoarthritisK24AR081368 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Amanda E Nelson · 2022 to 2026
$916k
The Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease Epidemiology and Outcomes Training Program at the University of North CarolinaT32AR082310 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LEIGH Fleming CALLAHAN, Amanda E Nelson · 2024 to 2026
$616k
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR081368NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072580NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR082310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress is associated with suboptimal outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict a high psychological distress phenotype using only preoperative data.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty at Duke University between 2018 and 2024. Phenotypes were derived using latent class analysis of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag tool. There were four models such as (1) elastic net, (2) XGBoost, (3) random forest, and (4) logistic regression trained to predict a high-distress phenotype using preoperative demographic, clinical, and patient-reported data. The dataset was split into training and testing sets (70:30). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, Brier score, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

resultsA total of 494 patients (64% women) undergoing TJA (knee 57%, hip 43%) were included; 18% (n = 89) were classified as having high postoperative distress. Patients in the high-distress phenotype demonstrated lower patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-physical function, higher patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-pain interference, pain ratings, and a greater prevalence of high-impact chronic pain. The elastic net model performed best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.85), compared with logistic regression (0.73), random forest (0.71), and XGBoost (0.65). Key preoperative predictors of high distress included a higher preoperative Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag count, greater pain, preoperative depression, and higher body mass index.

conclusionsCommonly collected data from routine preoperative clinical care show promise for predicting psychological distress after TJA. The elastic net model demonstrated the strongest overall performance and interpretability. Such models could support early identification of patients at risk for postoperative psychological distress, enabling targeted behavioral health referral or psychologically informed physical therapy prior to surgery. Future work should validate these models in larger, multisite cohorts.

Indexed as

machine learningoutcomespredictionpsychological distresstotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42208697
PMCPMC13379953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.