ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2026
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms Predicting Psychological Distress After Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychological distress is associated with suboptimal outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict a high psychological distress phenotype using only preoperative data.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty at Duke University between 2018 and 2024. Phenotypes were derived using latent class analysis of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag tool. There were four models such as (1) elastic net, (2) XGBoost, (3) random forest, and (4) logistic regression trained to predict a high-distress phenotype using preoperative demographic, clinical, and patient-reported data. The dataset was split into training and testing sets (70:30). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, Brier score, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curve analysis.
resultsA total of 494 patients (64% women) undergoing TJA (knee 57%, hip 43%) were included; 18% (n = 89) were classified as having high postoperative distress. Patients in the high-distress phenotype demonstrated lower patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-physical function, higher patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-pain interference, pain ratings, and a greater prevalence of high-impact chronic pain. The elastic net model performed best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.85), compared with logistic regression (0.73), random forest (0.71), and XGBoost (0.65). Key preoperative predictors of high distress included a higher preoperative Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag count, greater pain, preoperative depression, and higher body mass index.
conclusionsCommonly collected data from routine preoperative clinical care show promise for predicting psychological distress after TJA. The elastic net model demonstrated the strongest overall performance and interpretability. Such models could support early identification of patients at risk for postoperative psychological distress, enabling targeted behavioral health referral or psychologically informed physical therapy prior to surgery. Future work should validate these models in larger, multisite cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.