ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving airport security with IoT-powered deep learning methods for threat detection and intelligent recommendation systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a novel framework that integrates deep learning algorithms, intelligent recommendation systems, and Internet-of-things (IoT) devices to improve airport security. Surveillance cameras are used by the system to identify potentially dangerous activities, such leaving luggage unattended. By analyzing interactions and movement patterns, anomalies can be found, and security staff can receive notifications. To improve security measures based on historical data and current information, it makes use of recommendation systems. This integrated approach reduces false alerts, improves operating efficiency, and strengthens security safeguards. Case studies and simulations confirm the framework's effectiveness. Interestingly, transfer learning using MVCNN architecture detected threats in test data that had never been seen before with an accuracy of above 95%. Additionally, the suggested ISODI approach outperformed Decision Tree and K-Nearest Neighbors in identifying anomalies associated with aircraft delays, with an accuracy of 0.99. These results show how the framework can raise airport security requirements. Notwithstanding the beneficial developments of this paradigm, more investigation is necessary to identify the best use case for it in the security systems in place today and to handle any privacy issues that may arise. To handle the complexities of various airport environments, practical systems would require extensive testing and adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.