Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42210141›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Integrating GWAS-guided markers preselection with genomic selection enhances prediction of pulpwood-related traits in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Englem.).

Yadi Wu, Xianyin Ding, Shu Diao, Qinyun Huang, Guiqi Shang, Zifeng Tan, Shaoze Wu, Xiahui Hua, Chengbo He, Qifu Luan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yadi WuResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Xianyin DingResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China. brighten@caf.ac.cn.
Shu DiaoResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Qinyun HuangResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Guiqi ShangCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China.
Zifeng TanResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Shaoze WuResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Xiahui HuaResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Chengbo HeResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China.
Qifu LuanResearch Institution of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration On Forest Cultivation and Management in East China, Hangzhou, 311400, China. qifu.luan@caf.ac.cn.
Zhi-Qiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Harry X WuDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Center, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project 2023ZD04059 and 2023ZD0405805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to enhance the efficiency of genomic prediction for pulpwood-related traits in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) by integrating genome-wide association study (GWAS) information with genomic selection (GS). We evaluated 12 traits related to growth, fiber, and wood chemical composition in a population of 340 individuals genotyped with 319,286 high-quality SNPs, comparing the performance of six GS models, including GBLUP and Bayesian methods, under varying training population sizes and marker densities. The results showed that while both GBLUP and Bayesian Lasso performed well, Bayesian Lasso slightly outperformed GBLUP for fiber traits. Predictive ability (PA) plateaued at approximately 100 K SNPs for fiber traits, 60 K for DBH, and 10 K for wood chemical composition traits in all models. Using 100 K random SNPs, PA ranged from 0.05 to 0.23, which expanded to 0.09-0.35 with GWAS-guided SNP preselection (maximum improvement of 16.26%) and further broadened to 0.01-0.38 by incorporating large-effect QTLs (greatest improvement of 23.54%). Overall, integrating GWAS information into GS frameworks significantly improved prediction accuracy as assessed by t-test, offering a cost-effective strategy to accelerate genetic improvement. These findings provide practical guidance for enhancing breeding efficiency in slash pine and other conifer breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPinusSelection, GeneticWoodBayes TheoremGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic MarkersBayesian LassoGenomic selectionPulpwood propertiesSlash pineSNP preselection

Identifiers

PMID42210141
PMCPMC13411155

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.