ArticleBMC medicine2026
Machine learning and natural language processing for the identification of potential mental disorders among school-age children: a prospective birth cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of childhood mental health disorders is a critical public health objective. Existing screening approaches, largely dependent on observer reports, are resource-intensive and may overlook subtle internalized symptoms. The analysis of children's linguistic expression presents a scalable and potentially more objective alternative. This study evaluates whether combining natural language processing (NLP) of children's essays with conventional risk factors improves the detection of mental health difficulties in school-age populations, relative to models based on a single data source.
methodsWe conducted a prospective analysis using data from the UK-based National Child Development Study (NCDS), a national birth cohort initiated in 1958. Data from birth, age 7, and age 11 assessments were analyzed. The final sample included 8,981 children (4,428 [49.3%] female) who completed a creative writing essay at age 11 describing their imagined life at age 25. Predictors comprised traditional risk factors (perinatal, socioeconomic, and parental engagement variables) and linguistic features computationally extracted from the essays. The primary outcome was potential mental health disorder at age 11, defined as scoring above the 95th or 90th percentile on the teacher-completed Bristol Social Adjustment Guide (BSAG). The mother-completed Rutter A Scale was used for sensitivity analysis. Machine learning models incorporating various predictor combinations were developed, and their predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values.
resultsUsing BSAG 95th percentile threshold, models combining top five selected variables with essay features achieved significantly higher predictive capability (AUROC:0.77, 95%CI:0.71-0.83) compared to models using all variables (AUROC:0.70, 95%CI:0.63-0.76) or essay features alone (AUROC:0.67, 95%CI:0.60-0.74). At 90th percentile threshold, this integrated approach showed similar improvement (AUROC:0.81, 95%CI:0.78-0.85). Key predictors included gestational length, maternal parity, parental age, residential characteristics, parental engagement metrics, and children's body mass index. Sensitivity analyses using Rutter A Scale confirmed these findings.
conclusionsIn this prospective birth cohort study, integrating NLP analysis of children's essays with a small set of key risk factors substantially improved the identification of potential mental health disorders. This integrated approach represents a potential paradigm for developing scalable, objective screening tools, but requires validation in contemporary, diverse pediatric populations before clinical consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.