ReviewMolecular cancer2026
Multi-omic profiles of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: an integrated landscape.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Genomic Patterns of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) Identify Sub-Sets for Rational Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors distinguished by substantial variability in morphology, immunophenotype, molecular characteristics, and clinical behavior. In recent years, the advent of multiple omics-based methodologies has significantly enhanced our understanding of these neoplasms. Integrating histology and genomics with survival analyses has clarified that the fundamental distinction within this disease spectrum lies between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Furthermore, genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenetic profiling have deepened the granularity of the PanNET landscape, revealing marked differences even within the same diagnostic category, with important clinical implications. For example, DAXX/ATRX mutations, activation of the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway, BEND2 gene fusions, and an α-cell transcriptional profile are more frequently associated with adverse outcomes. Additional omics approaches, including metabolomics, proteomics, radiomics, and the more recently developed spatially resolved methodologies, are further expanding current knowledge in this challenging field. In this review, we provide an integrated overview of PanNENs, synthesizing insights generated across diverse multi-omics platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.