ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Novel biomarkers for sarcopenia: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sarcopenia is an age-related syndrome characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. It is associated with an increased risk of falls, disability, and mortality, as well as a significant healthcare burden. Traditional assessment of sarcopenia relies on imaging techniques and physical function tests, which have important limitations, including operational complexity, difficulty in early identification, and inability to reflect underlying molecular mechanisms. The emergence of candidate biomarkers-including muscle-specific factors, inflammation-related proteins, non-coding RNAs, and nutritional metabolites-has enabled a more precise elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease across multiple dimensions, such as protein homeostasis, chronic inflammation, post-transcriptional regulation, and energy metabolism. These advances provide new avenues for early identification, risk stratification, identification of disease subtypes, and the development of personalized intervention strategies. This article reviews the potential applications and current challenges of these candidate biomarkers in both clinical practice and research on sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.