SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Combined diet and physical activity effects on health-related outcomes in people with overweight or obesity: an overview of systematic reviews.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This overview synthesized evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of combined physical activity (PA) and diet interventions versus diet-only or PA-only approaches on obesity-related anthropometric, cardiometabolic, and physical fitness outcomes, and identified program features linked to better effects. Methods: We conducted an Overview of SRs following Cochrane guidance and PRIOR standards. Five databases were searched until June 13, 2024, and Google Scholar was updated on January 25, 2025. Eligible SRs synthesized randomized controlled trials of combined PA and diet interventions in people with overweight or obesity. We extracted key intervention characteristics, outcomes, and meta-analytic estimates where available. Methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, and overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA). Results: Thirty-two SRs (19 meta-analyses) met inclusion criteria. In adults, combined PA and diet interventions generally outperformed single-component comparators for reducing weight, BMI, waist circumference, and fat mass, and improving cardiorespiratory fitness. More favorable and sustained effects were most often reported in programs lasting ≥6-12 months with frequent, structured contact and supervised, resistance-inclusive exercise. In children and adolescents, face-to-face and family-engaged programs produced the most consistent improvements in BMI/BMI-z, but effects often attenuated 6-12 months after program end without maintenance. In older adults, combined programs reduce fat mass while preserving lean mass, strength, and function. Across diverse settings (including type 2 diabetes, workplaces, and digital delivery), combined interventions improved glucose control, insulin resistance, lipids, and inflammation, and some benefits occurred even without additional weight loss. Long-term lifestyle programs reduced incident type 2 diabetes by about half. Review quality varied (31% high; 69% low/critically low) and overlap between SRs was minimal (CCA 0.0-0.6%). Conclusion: Combined PA and diet interventions tended to outperform diet-only and PA-only approaches. The most consistent and durable benefits were linked to longer duration, higher contact, supervision, resistance training, and family engagement in youth, underscoring maintenance planning. These findings support prioritizing structured lifestyle programs, including scalable hybrid/digital delivery models, while interpreting effects cautiously given the predominance of low-quality SRs. Future research should improve rigor, standardize outcomes, report intervention dose and behavior-change methods, include longer follow-up, and improve representation of underserved groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.