ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Functional reprogramming of melittin by Pluronic
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional anticancer treatments have a number of limitations, including significant toxicity to healthy cells. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new therapeutic methods and strategies that utilize bioactive compounds with high selectivity for cancer cells while simultaneously limiting toxicity. Melittin is a membrane-active antimicrobial peptide known for its significant anticancer potential; nevertheless, its pronounced hemolytic activity greatly restricts its therapeutic use. In this work, strategy to functionally separate anticancer efficacy from hemolytic toxicity using Pluronic Methods: A549 human lung adenocarcinoma and HeLa cervical carcinoma cell lines were subjected to treatment with melittin (0.5-50 µg/mL), PF127 (1-5%), and their combinations. Cancer cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay, and cell apoptosis was evaluated using flow cytometry. Cell migration capabilities of treated cancer cells were determined using scratch assay. The hemolytic activity of melittin and the melittin/Pluronic Results: Our studies confirmed that melittin displays anticancer effects against A549 and HeLa cell lines in a dose-dependent manner and this effect is further augmented in the presence of PF127. Migration experiments revealed significant suppression of cancer cell motility after exposure to melittin/PF127. Furthermore, the use of the melittin/PF127 combination reduced the hemolytic activity of melittin in relation to RBCs. Conclusions: Co-treatment of cancer cells with melittin and PF127 enables selective anticancer effects while attenuating hemolytic activity. The findings indicate that the toxicity of membrane-active peptides and their anticancer effectiveness can be separated through formulation employment, underscoring PF127 as a promising element in the strategic development of safer melittin-based anticancer approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.