Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211715›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Explainable AI for early developmental disability detection: a neuro-fuzzy approach.

Adel Saber Alanazi, Sohil Alqazlan, Rayan Alanazi, Houcine Benlaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adel Saber AlanaziCollege of Education, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Sohil AlqazlanCollege of Education, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan AlanaziCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Houcine BenlariaCollege of Business, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Developmental disabilities affect approximately 1 in 6 children aged 3-17 years. The diagnostic process typically spans 2-3 years and disproportionately affects underserved populations. Traditional machine learning approaches for screening have demonstrated promising accuracy but often lack the transparency required for clinical acceptance. Methods: We developed and validated an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) using a longitudinal observational dataset of 5,000 children aged 1-6 years from 12 early childhood centers (4,311 typically developing; 689 with developmental disabilities, prevalence 13.8%). The ANFIS model implemented Gaussian membership functions and Sugeno fuzzy inference, incorporating age-adjusted ratios and cross-domain interaction features. Model performance was evaluated using standard binary classification metrics and five-fold stratified cross-validation. Results: All four assessment domains differed significantly between diagnostic groups ( Conclusion: The ANFIS approach demonstrates a clinically relevant balance between diagnostic accuracy and interpretability, positioning it as a viable clinical decision-support tool. Larger external validation studies across diverse populations are required before widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesFuzzy LogicChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningAdaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)autism spectrum disorderdevelopmental disabilitiesearly interventionexplainable AIfuzzy logicinterpretable machine learningpediatrics diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42211715
PMCPMC13213843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.