ArticleCirculation2026
A Genome-First Study of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Comparing African and European Ancestry Individuals.
Article in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by lifelong elevated LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and increased risk for premature myocardial infarction. FH research has focused on European populations and, consequently, estimates of global FH burden primarily reflect this ancestry, with limited data available from other groups.
methodsWe examined the prevalence and clinical outcomes of FH among 104 300 African ancestry individuals enrolled in 3 US-based cohorts: the National Institutes of Health's All of Us, Mount Sinai's BioMe, and Geisinger's MyCode. Genetic variants were evaluated according to standards provided by the Clinical Genome Resource's FH Variant Curation Expert Panel and grouped as pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance (VUSs). Participants were assigned to European and African ancestry groups based on genetic similarity to reference populations. Clinical outcomes were LDL-C and myocardial infarction. Analyses were adjusted for age and sex. Results were meta-analyzed across cohorts.
resultsThe prevalence of a pathogenic variant was similar in the African (1 in 306) and European (1 in 273) ancestry groups. The LDL-C elevation associated with pathogenic variants was 20.81 mg/dL (95% CI, 16.17-25.45) greater in individuals with African ancestry compared with their counterparts with European ancestry. Individuals with African ancestry had 1.61 (95% CI, 1.42-1.83;
conclusionsThe prevalence of pathogenic variants did not significantly vary between African and European ancestry groups. VUSs were both more prevalent among individuals of African ancestry and associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction equivalent to that of a pathogenic variant. These findings suggest that dependence on existing resources for variant classification could contribute to underdiagnosis of FH in individuals of African ancestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.