ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
From AI anxiety to educational opportunity: equitable and practical uses of artificial intelligence in STEM education.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical and positive uses of AI in STEM education: taming the AI tiger.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into higher education has generated both enthusiasm and concern among STEM educators. Current discourse has largely emphasized risks related to academic integrity, student overreliance, and assessment validity. While these concerns are justified, an exclusive focus on restriction risks overlooking the potential of artificial intelligence as a constructive pedagogical implement, particularly in resource-limited academic environments. In this perspective, we argue that generative artificial intelligence, when integrated transparently and ethically, can function as an equity-enhancing tool in STEM education by extending mentorship, supporting scientific communication, and facilitating active learning. Drawing on graduate-level teaching and laboratory mentoring experiences in life sciences disciplines within a Global South context, we illustrate how artificial intelligence can help address structural constraints such as limited faculty time, language barriers, and uneven access to academic support. We also examine challenges associated with artificial intelligence adoption, including dependency, unequal access, and institutional resistance, and outline practical strategies for responsible integration. Rather than framing artificial intelligence as a threat to learning, we propose that STEM educators view it as an opportunity to modernize pedagogy, foster artificial intelligence literacy, and better prepare students for contemporary biological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.