Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213078›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026

Is there already value in "total body PET" imaging in neurology?

Alexander Hammers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander HammersKing' College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-4848

Funding

Biomedical Research CentreCentre for Medical Engineering at King's College London WT 203148/Z/16/ZDepartment of HealthEPSRCKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustKing's College LondonKing's College London's Rights Retention policyMRC MR/Y008987/1National Institute for Health ResearchNHS Foundation TrustThe School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesWellcomeWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Total Body" PET (TBP) represents a step change for all of PET, and brain imaging is no exception. Multiple benefits are already being seen. Lower injected doses benefit patients and staff and facilitate multitracer research. Shortened acquisition times for suitable radiopharmaceuticals enable better patient comfort and reduce the need for general anesthesia in children (albeit then partially negating the dose benefit). Later scanning enabled by the higher sensitivity palliates restrictions in tracer availability and allows better modeling. The large axial field-of-view enables better quantification via assessment of intravascular radioactivity concentrations. Early short-frame dynamic scanning has already enabled obtaining quantitative brain perfusion measurements for several radiopharmaceuticals. The large field-of-view allows assessment of brain-body interactions and multiorgan repercussions of disease. Despite some technical and methodological challenges remaining, TBP already offers added value in brain imaging, with exciting times ahead.

Indexed as

NeurologyPositron-Emission TomographyWhole Body ImagingBrainHumansRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticalsbrainlarge axial field-of-viewPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID42213078
PMCPMC13489389

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.