ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Operonic architecture of bacterial metal response: envelope constraints, evolutionary mobility, and bioremediation design rules.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteria encounter metals as both essential micronutrients and persistent toxins. These conflicting requirements are managed by genetic components, often organized as operons or coordinated regulons, which link sensing to trafficking, buffering, export, detoxification, biotransformation, and, in certain instances, storage. This review develops a gene-organization-focused perspective on bacterial metal responses, emphasizing metallostasis, resistance, envelope topology, evolutionary mobility, and bioremediation relevance, highlighting two key principles. Firstly, metallostasis maintains homeostatic set-points for essential metals by regulating uptake, allocation, and overflow. Secondly, the cell envelope's topology serves as a primary constraint. In contrast, resistance mechanisms for toxic metals and metalloids strive to achieve near-zero intracellular concentrations by facilitating rapid clearance. Gram-negative bacteria often employ compartmental "handoff" strategies that connect cytosolic relief to high-capacity envelope clearance. Conversely, Gram-positive envelopes tend to favor responses that involve inner-membrane export, along with cytosolic or cell wall buffering. This review structures the components into a modular toolkit, encompassing sensors and regulators, uptake control, exporters and clearance pumps, periplasmic partners, detoxification enzymes, and the dichotomy between sequestration and storage. It further seeks to link recurring architectures to evolutionary mobility and co-selection with antibiotic resistance. Ultimately, these insights are applied to bioremediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213201What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.