ReviewPituitary2026
Osteometabolic complications in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas: Is there an impact of gender?
Review in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authors' reply to the Comment on Osteometabolic complications in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas: Is there an impact of gender?Pituitary · 2026Article
- Comment on: Osteometabolic complications in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas: Is there an impact of gender?"Pituitary · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pituitary adenomas are common intracranial neoplasms and represent a clinically relevant but frequently underrecognized cause of secondary osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Hormonal excess, coexisting pituitary deficiencies, and the iatrogenic burden of multimodal treatments act synergistically to impair bone remodeling, microarchitecture, and mechanical strength. Consequently, skeletal fragility may manifest at a relatively young age and is often inadequately predicted by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived areal bone mineral density (aBMD) alone.This narrative review summarizes current evidence on skeletal involvement in functioning pituitary adenomas, including acromegaly, Cushing's disease (CD), prolactinomas, and thyrotropin [TSH]-secreting adenomas (TSHomas), with a specific focus on sex-related differences relevant to clinical practice. Although several pituitary adenomas are more prevalent in women, male patients frequently present with delayed diagnoses, harboring larger and more aggressive tumors. Consequently, men may be affected by a longer cumulative exposure to hormone excess and a higher prevalence and severity of panhypopituitarism, often exacerbated by the mass effect and multiline therapies. Across clinical cohorts, these interacting factors are consistently associated with an increased burden of fragility fractures, particularly in male patients.In pituitary disorders, fracture risk is commonly underestimated because DXA-derived aBMD does not adequately capture alterations in bone quality and structural integrity. Comprehensive skeletal evaluation, including systematic vertebral morphometry, trabecular bone score (TBS), and selected advanced imaging techniques, improves detection of occult fractures and refines fracture risk stratification. Moreover, the persistently low awareness, diagnosis, and treatment rates of osteoporosis in men represent a substantial and potentially modifiable gap in care, particularly in secondary forms related to endocrine diseases.This review highlights the need for a proactive, sex-aware clinical approach that integrates endocrine management with appropriate skeletal assessment and bone-directed therapy, with the aim of reducing fracture burden and improving long-term outcomes in patients with pituitary diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213233What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.