ReviewDrugs2026
Sex-Biased Pharmacotherapeutic Disparities in Hypertension.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension manifests with striking sex-based disparities in prevalence, pathophysiology, and therapeutic outcomes, necessitating the reappraisal of current management paradigms. For example, men exhibit higher blood pressure (BP) in early adulthood, while post-menopausal women suffer from accelerated cardiovascular risk owing to estrogen depletion, endothelial dysfunction, and distinct aging trajectories. Moreover, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) operates rather divergently: testosterone upregulates vasoconstrictive angiotensin II type 1 receptors in men, whereas estrogen enhances nitric oxide bioavailability and modulates angiotensin II type 2 receptor in premenopausal women. These hormonal influences extend to cardiovascular aging, as women develop greater arterial stiffness post-menopause, predisposing them to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Conversely, men demonstrate higher endothelial dysfunction and cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Furthermore, sex-specific pharmacokinetic profiles (e.g., renal clearance, hepatic metabolism) and pharmacodynamic responses to antihypertensives underscore the inadequacy of uniform treatment strategies. This is demonstrated in women by the observed reduced efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors, but superior blood pressure control using diuretics. Men, however, respond more robustly to beta blockers. Emerging evidence highlights epigenetic modifiers, including X-chromosome-linked microRNAs (miRNAs) and sex-hormone-driven transcriptional regulators, as pivotal mediators of vascular tone and drug metabolism disparities. Despite these insights, clinical guidelines remain relatively inadequately stratified by sex, perpetuating suboptimal outcomes. This review synthesizes molecular, physiologic, and pharmacotherapeutic axes of sexual dimorphism in hypertension. It also advocates for precision medicine approaches that integrate hormonal status, aging-related vascular remodeling, and genetic polymorphisms. Addressing these physiological paradigms promises to bridge the translational gap between bench and bedside, ultimately mitigating the global burden of hypertensive disease, while mitigating shortcomings in sex-based antihypertensive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.