Evidence mapPaperPMID 42213360Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2026

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review.

Juan Máximo Molina-Linde, Juliana Ester Martín-López, María Piedad Rosario-Lozano, Juan Antonio Blasco-Amaro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Máximo Molina-LindeÁrea de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA), Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Seville, Spain. jmaximo.molina@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-5530
Juliana Ester Martín-LópezÁrea de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA), Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9084-8659
María Piedad Rosario-LozanoÁrea de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA), Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2966-8524
Juan Antonio Blasco-AmaroÁrea de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA), Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5500-8187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, safety, and organisational aspects of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), focusing on pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, and abdominal conditions.

methodsA systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2024. Grey literature and trial registries were also explored. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in NICU neonates were included. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Due to substantial heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed.

resultsThirteen diagnostic accuracy studies were included, evaluating pulmonary (n = 8), cardiac (n = 2), neurological (n = 2), and abdominal (n = 1) conditions. Most studies were observational and single-centre. In pulmonary conditions, sensitivity ranged from 80.0 to 100% and specificity from 63.6 to 100%. For patent ductus arteriosus, sensitivity ranged from 68.7 to 100% and specificity from 87.5 to 93.7%. In neurological pathology, POCUS showed high accuracy for severe intraventricular haemorrhage, but lower sensitivity for smaller or localised lesions. In abdominal pathology, sensitivity ranged from 45.0 to 90.9% and specificity from 85.7 to 89.2%. No adverse events attributable to POCUS were reported, although safety was not systematically assessed. Evidence on organisational aspects was limited and inconsistently reported.

conclusionPOCUS may provide valuable bedside diagnostic information in NICUs, particularly in pulmonary conditions. However, the evidence remains limited by heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and operator dependence. Further prospective multicentre studies with standardised protocols are needed.

Indexed as

Diagnostic accuracyNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatePoint-of-care ultrasoundSystematic review

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.