ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Video-based detection of Delirium in hospitalized adults.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delirium, a dynamic neuropsychiatric condition associated with morbidity and mortality, remains underdiagnosed due to reliance on subjective, intermittent screening tools. Objective and potentially continuous identification is needed to improve clinical care. We developed and validated an analytic framework for delirium classification based on automatically extracted video features. In this prospective cohort study, patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to the inpatient medical or neurological ward of a tertiary academic center between August 2020 and March 2022 with an expected stay longer than one night were enrolled. Daily structured delirium assessments and brief video recordings were performed in consenting patients. Videos were analyzed using deep learning pose estimation to extract keypoints and calculate behavioral features based on eye, face, and limb postures and movements. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, gradient boosting, support vector machines, and random forests) were trained to predict delirium status from extracted features. Model performance was evaluated on 20 repetitions of three-fold cross-validation using the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC ROC). The cohort included 109 videos from 25 male and 25 female participants (median age: 72, IQR: 63.25-78). Twenty videos (18%) were from patients with delirium. Keypoints for this dataset were more accurately extracted using a customized ResNet-101 model developed with DeepLabCut (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.89, compared to human-labeled gold standards) than using off-the-shelf models. Keypoints were then used to generate behavioral features summarizing movement and postures throughout the video. A support vector machine model achieved an average delirium classification AUC ROC of 0.79 (SD ± 0.09), sensitivity of 0.71 (SD ± 0.16), and specificity of 0.78 (SD ± 0.07). This study demonstrates the feasibility of identifying delirium using brief videos in clinically heterogeneous cohorts and reveals novel features for objective identification.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.