Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213874›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2026

Embedding Lived Expertise into Military and Veteran Medical Research.

James Hentig, Laura Hentig, Jonathan Lu, Thomas Murphy, Caitlin Russell, Ricky Ditzel, Michelle Patch, Jessica M Gill, Lisa A Brenner, MaryJo Pugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James HentigSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5371-9049
Laura HentigDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, United States.
Jonathan LuIndependent Researcher, HardHat Wellness, LLC, Dayton, OH 45402, United States.
Thomas MurphySchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Caitlin RussellSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Ricky DitzelRush University Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Michelle PatchSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Jessica M GillSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Lisa A BrennerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry, and Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
MaryJo PughInformatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, United States.

Funding

HSRD VA IK6 HX003762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Military and Veterans health research has substantially advanced in recent decades, particularly in terms of analytic sophistication aimed at characterizing the biopsychosocial complexity of health through biomarkers, neuroimaging, and predictive modeling. However, formal models (e.g., governance structures) for including individuals with lived experiences to guide this work have not evolved at the same pace. Drawing on our collective perspectives as Veterans, Caregivers, and academic partners, this commentary examines the structural limitations of current engagement processes. Although community advisory boards or similar mechanisms have become increasingly common, engagement often occurs after key design decisions have been established, limiting meaningful influence on investigative topics, hypothesis formation, confounder identification, endpoint prioritization, and analytic strategy. Caregivers, including those supporting service members with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder, remain even less integrated, despite their critical role in long-term recovery. Here, we propose a Patient-Researcher model characterized by upstream integration, sustained engagement, and structured mentorship. Embedding individuals with lived experiences throughout the research process strengthens construct validity, improves translational relevance, and better aligns research with the realities of military and Veteran life.

Identifiers

PMID42213874
PMCPMC13392925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.