ArticleScientific reports2026
Negative automatic thoughts mediate the effects of emotion regulation on distress in women with breast and gynecological cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer's emotionally taxing nature offers a compelling real-world model for examining psychological distress. Despite its relevance, empirical research remains limited on the cognitive mechanisms, particularly self-referent negative automatic thoughts (NATs) and emotion regulation (ER), sustaining distress in chronic illness. In this cross-sectional study women (N = 230) diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer completed self-report measures of distress, depressive and anxiety symptoms, cognitive emotion regulation and negative automatic thoughts, along with sociodemographic and clinical data. Structural equation modeling was used for analysis. Mediation analyses revealed that maladaptive emotion regulation was positively associated with psychological distress (β = 0.405), depression (β = 0.631), and anxiety (β = 0.660), with NATs partially mediating these effects. Adaptive ER showed weaker total effects, but significant indirect effects via reduced NATs. A latent distress or general psychological distress (PD) model demonstrated excellent fit and confirmed partial mediation. NATs uniquely predicted depressive symptoms beyond general distress, underscoring their central role. The findings highlight the central role of maladaptive ER and NATs in psychological distress among cancer patients. The results support cognitive models suggesting that targeting maladaptive cognitive patterns may yield improvements in emotional well-being. The PD model offers a parsimonious, transdiagnostic framework for conceptualizing shared vulnerability across symptom domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.