Trial reportScientific reports2026
Bridge technique self-traction improves outcomes over conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for semicircumferential gastric cardia neoplasms in a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of the novel "Bridge Technique" self-traction endoscopic submucosal dissection (BT-ESD) versus conventional ESD (C-ESD) for treating semi-circumferential or larger superficial neoplasms of the gastric cardia. A single-center, randomized controlled trial. The First Hospital of Putian City of Fujian Province, China for period of July 2020 to December 2023. Eighty patients with gastric cardia adenoma or early carcinoma were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the BT-ESD group or the C-ESD group. Outcome measures included lesion size (longest diameter), procedure time, resection speed, submucosal injection volume, en bloc resection rate, frequency of intraprocedural bleeding, hospitalization duration, and complications (perforation, postoperative bleeding, infection). The mean lesion long diameter was comparable between groups (BT-ESD: 55.7 ± 15.6 mm; C-ESD: 55.2 ± 10.6 mm). Compared to the C-ESD group, the BT-ESD group demonstrated a significantly shorter procedure time, lower submucosal injection volume, and reduced frequency of intraprocedural bleeding (all p < 0.05). Resection speed was significantly faster in the BT-ESD group. The en bloc resection rate was higher and the postoperative infection rate was lower in the BT-ESD group (p < 0.05). Overall complication rates were lower with BT-ESD, but the difference was not statistically significant(p > 0.05). For large (≥ semi-circumferential) superficial lesions of the gastric cardia, the "Bridge Technique" self-traction ESD is a safe, efficient, and rapid approach. The BT-ESD technique demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of procedure time, en bloc resection rate, and intraprocedural bleeding compared with conventional ESD. This device-free self-traction method represents a useful addition to the endoscopic toolbox for large cardia lesions, but further studies are needed to compare it with other traction-assisted techniques.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600119809 Date of retrospectively Registration March 4, 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.