ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2026
Can Behavioral Interventions Promote Health Equity in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes? A Narrative Review of Promising Treatments.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewSynthesize data on whether existing behavioral interventions can improve health equity among youth with type 1 diabetes. RECENT
findingsWhile existing behavioral interventions demonstrated efficacy in improving health and/or psychosocial outcomes, evidence that these same interventions may improve health equity were lacking. Most interventions were evaluated using predominantly White and affluent samples and some studies did not report on racial, ethnic, or sociodemographic characteristics of their sample. Only a few interventions have been adapted for youth from minoritized backgrounds. Recent multisystemic and technology/mHealth interventions recruited samples that were sociodemographically representative of youth experiencing disparities, suggesting that these interventions could improve health and/or psychosocial outcomes for these sociodemographic groups. However, no studies conducted subgroup analyses to examine whether the effect of the intervention might vary as a function of sociodemographic characteristics. The prevalence and persistence of disparities in psychosocial and glycemic outcomes among youth with T1D underscore the urgent need for effective, evidence-based behavioral interventions for populations in most need of this care. There is a critical need for research that prioritizes recruitment of samples that represent youth most impacted by health disparities. Additionally, existing interventions can be adapted for youth from minoritized backgrounds. Future research would benefit from leveraging existing intervention development/adaptation frameworks and engaging community partners through the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.