ArticleBMC biotechnology2026
Antimicrobial potential of different bee product-loaded carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant clinical pathogens: a comparative in vitro study.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is one of the major public health threats facing humanity. Hence, the current investigation aimed to develop alternative therapeutic strategies by integrating apitherapy with biopolymer-based nanotechnology to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) microbial pathogens.
methodsOut of 100 clinical microbial isolates, 29 highly MDR clinical pathogens from different infections, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., were selected for the study. Three bee products (Turkish propolis extract (P), Egyptian honey (H), and Egyptian royal jelly (RJ)) were used, and their polyphenolic contents were determined via HPLC analysis. These bee products were encapsulated within carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles (CMC NPs). The resulting nano-formulations, namely Carboxymethyl chitosan-Propolis extract nanoparticles (CMC-P NPs), Carboxymethyl chitosan-Honey nanoparticles (CMC-H NPs), and Carboxymethyl chitosan-Royal Jelly nanoparticles (CMC-RJ NPs), were characterized in terms of particle size, surface charge, and chemical composition. Their antimicrobial activity and preliminary cytocompatibility were evaluated using standard microbiological assays and the MTT assay, respectively.
resultsHPLC analysis confirmed the presence of diverse polyphenolic compounds in the bee products. The highest concentrations were detected in the ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) (51.0-40993 µg/g), followed by honey (1.06-1591.16 µg/g) and royal jelly (0.53-2796.37 µg/g). Among the nano-formulations, CMC-P NPs emerged as the most potent formulation (size: 100.7 nm, zeta potential: -70 mV), showing significant bactericidal activity (P < 0.05) against all MDR isolates. Notably, CMC-P NPs exhibited inhibition zones (17.67-31.33 mm) and MIC values (0.019-1.25 mg/mL) that were superior to standard antibiotic controls. CMC-H NPs and CMC-RJ NPs exhibited variable antimicrobial effects, depending on the pathogen and the encapsulated bee product. Indeed, all three nano-formulations demonstrated strong antimicrobial action against highly resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella ozaenae. Further, MTT assay results confirmed the preliminary biocompatibility of the nanostructures, showing no significant toxicity toward RPE1 cells.
conclusionEncapsulation of bee products within CMC NPs significantly enhances their antimicrobial performance against a wide range of MDR clinical pathogens. The developed nano-formulations exhibited suitable physicochemical properties, potent antimicrobial activity, and promising preliminary biocompatibility, supporting their potential as safe and effective antimicrobial candidates for further preclinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.