Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026
The effect of the Baby-Feed website intervention on diet quality in healthy infants: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05990439 (Baby-Feed Web Application for Infant Caregivers to Improve Diets and Weight Gain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Baby-Feed Web Application for Infant Caregivers to Improve Diets and Weight Gain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent infant diet recommendations are often not followed by caregivers, impacting their infant's diet quality. Incorporating diet guidelines with real-time feedback via technology may improve infant diet quality, helping mitigate future obesity risk. This study reports the effectiveness of the Baby-Feed website in improving diet quality among US infant caregivers compared to controls. This website was designed using trusted behavior-change theories to provide real-time feedback on infant diets, show current infant diet recommendations, and monitor progress.
methodsPrimary infant caregivers (English or Spanish-literate) with internet access, cellphone text capability, and willing to participate in the full study were enrolled into a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Infant diet quality was assessed by the total Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) at baseline (~ 4 months old) and at the end of the study (~ 9 months old). The DQIS (0-55) is scored as: for 0-5.9 months, 15 points for exclusive and 10 points for partial breastfeeding, and 5 points for formula, while other foods score 5 if not introduced and 0 if introduced; for 6-12 months, appropriate intake of each food group (including formula) scores 5 (2.5 if slightly off, 0 if outside recommendations), with same score for breastfeeding. Total DQIS was categorized as ≥45 (excellent) or below. Data were analyzed with ANCOVA or logistic regression, adjusting for infant age and energy intake.
resultsOne hundred fifty-five participants were randomized, and 150 were included in the analysis (76 in the intervention group and 74 in the control group). At the end of the intervention, infant total DQIS was higher in the intervention group (44.6 ± 6.53) than in the control group (42.5 ± 7.5) in both the unadjusted (p = 0.036) and adjusted models (p = 0.046). Also, infants in the control group had twice the odds of having an infant total DQIS below excellent (adjusted OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.012-3.950; p = 0.046) compared to the intervention group.
conclusionsUsing the Baby-Feed website for 6 months improved the quality of infant diets. This could be a tool to help caregivers follow current infant diet recommendations with real-time feedback.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05990439.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.