ArticleBMC nursing2026
Investigating the associations between AI-Based educational tool utilization, academic procrastination, academic achievement, and time management among nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education has transformed the way students learn and manage their academic tasks. However, health professions education has not sufficiently studied the role of AI tools in procrastination, time management, and academic achievement.
objectivesTo investigate the associations of AI-based educational tools usage, academic procrastination, academic achievement, and time management among undergraduate nursing students.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 167 Jordanian undergraduate nursing students. Data was collected through validated scales measuring procrastination (General Procrastination Scale), time management skills (Time Management Questionnaire), and a researcher-developed scale measuring AI-based educational tool usage.
resultsParticipants demonstrated moderate levels of academic procrastination (mean = 58.28 ± 13.00) and time management (mean = 56.86 ± 11.34), alongside a very good academic achievement (GPA mean = 81.25 ± 7.80). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that AI-based educational tool usage (B = -0.22, p = 0.007) and time management (B = -0.38, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of academic procrastination. AI-based educational tool usage was also a significant predictor of time management (B = 0.24, p = 0.003). In addition, academic achievement was significantly predicted by AI-based educational tools usage (B = 0.24, p = 0.003), time management (B = 0.21, p = 0.007), and study hours (B = 2.85, p = 0.012).
conclusionThe use of AI-based educational tools was significantly associated with better academic performance among nursing students, alongside lower academic procrastination and better time management skills. The incorporation of AI into the learning process for nursing students may support the development of efficient learning habits and positive academic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.