SynthesisHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
Assessment Tools for Adherence to Prophylactic Haemophilia Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProphylactic treatment offers greater clinical benefits than on-demand therapy for patients with haemophilia, but these benefits depend on sustained adherence. Although adherence assessment is essential for understanding treatment effectiveness, a wide range of tools is used, and their characteristics, scope, and limitations have not been systematically synthesized.
aimThis systematic review aimed to identify and critically appraise assessment tools used to measure adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment in adult and adolescent patients.
methodsThe protocol followed PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273813). We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases including PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2000-2022 that reported on adherence to prophylaxis in adolescents and adults with haemophilia. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise key themes, variations, and the strengths and limitations of the studies.
resultsFrom the 22 studies, adherence was assessed using objective measures (prescription records), self-reported questionnaires, technology-assisted tools (electronic diaries and the Medtep Hemophilia online platform), and qualitative approaches. Self-reported questionnaires, particularly VERITAS-Pro and VERITAS-PRN, were the most frequently used adherence measures. Adherence assessment was frequently examined alongside medication supply and treatment practices, quality of life, bleeding episodes and haemarthrosis, joint health status, health beliefs and self-efficacy, environmental influences, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
conclusionVERITAS-Pro and VERITAS -PRN are central to the assessment of adherence to prophylactic haemophilia treatment. Their use alongside quality of life and illness perception measures supports clinical assessment and interpretation of adherence in both research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.