ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Dance for health impact in a rural Scottish island community: understanding stakeholder experiences.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research and practice around dance for promoting health and well-being are rapidly expanding, especially dance for chronic neurological conditions. Yet, research has primarily focused on assessing individual-level therapeutic outcomes, providing limited insight into broader stakeholder voices and community-level health impacts. In response, a longitudinal qualitative interview study was conducted to explore stakeholder perspectives on the community impact of a collaborative, community-centred dance for multiple sclerosis (MS) initiative in a rural Scottish island community. Repeated semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 19 participants, recruited purposively across three fieldwork visits. Participants included organizational partners, dance practitioners, musicians, volunteers, and dancers with MS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were developed: (i) amplifying specialist community dance capacity, supporting individual practitioners and the island's wider dance industry; (ii) promoting social capital and inclusion among the diverse local stakeholders involved, especially those living with MS; and (iii) providing a holistic well-being resource for participant dancers with MS, affording regular opportunities for physical, joyful, and meaningful activity through dance. By adopting a broader health promotion perspective, findings show that community-centred dance for health initiatives can generate a range of impacts in rural contexts both among and beyond the primary target participant group (i.e. people with MS), supporting capacity, inclusion, and well-being. Given the breadth of community impacts reported, findings also highlight the importance of maintaining such changes locally, suggesting the need for further consideration around organizational planning, support, and investment in the long-term sustainability of dance for health in rural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.