Evidence mapPaperPMID 42218178Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning and SHAP interpretation for predicting coronary heart disease-diabetes comorbidity with dietary antioxidants.

Kangrong Li, Gaoming Zeng, Zixi Zhang, Jiayi Zhu, Siyuan Tan, Zhongjun Ma, Qiuzhen Lin, Zhenjiang Liu, Na Liu, Qiming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kangrong Li *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Gaoming Zeng *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Zixi ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Jiayi ZhuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Siyuan TanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Zhongjun MaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Qiuzhen LinDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Zhenjiang LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Na LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. naliu1025@csu.edu.cn.
Qiming LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. qimingliu@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Hunan Natural Science Foundation 2024JJ5485National Natural Science Foundation of China 82300358the Clinical Medical Technology Innovation Guidance Project of the Hunan Provincial Department of Science and Technology NO.2021SK53527the National Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China No. 2024JJ6593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes mellitus frequently co-occur through shared mechanisms such as oxidative stress and inflammation. Whether specific dietary antioxidants mitigate CHD-diabetes comorbidity remains unclear. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018 data (n = 9,279), we developed an interpretable machine-learning pipeline in which standardisation and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) were embedded inside each fold of tenfold cross-validation to prevent data leakage. Six algorithms (Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), K-nearest neighbours, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were compared on discrimination, calibration and decision-curve net benefit. XGBoost achieved the highest AUC-ROC (0.774, 95% CI 0.759-0.788); Random Forest showed the lowest Brier score (0.111), the calibration slope closest to unity (0.939) and the highest net benefit, and was retained for interpretation. Weighted-quantile-sum regression showed an inverse association between the antioxidant composite and comorbidity risk (OR per quantile 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95; P = 0.001). In mutually adjusted logistic regression, only magnesium retained an independent protective association (per 1 SD: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96; P = 0.016). SHAP identified theobromine (0.020) and lycopene (0.016) as leading protective contributors. Findings support targeted dietary-antioxidant strategies as candidate modifiable factors for cardiometabolic comorbidity prevention.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCoronary DiseaseDiabetes MellitusMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsComorbidityDietFemaleHumansMaleNutrition SurveysPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestAntioxidantsComorbidityCoronary heart diseaseDiabetes mellitusDietary antioxidantsLycopeneMachine learningNHANESSHAP interpretationTheobromine

Identifiers

PMID42218178
PMCPMC13457878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.