ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning and SHAP interpretation for predicting coronary heart disease-diabetes comorbidity with dietary antioxidants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes mellitus frequently co-occur through shared mechanisms such as oxidative stress and inflammation. Whether specific dietary antioxidants mitigate CHD-diabetes comorbidity remains unclear. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018 data (n = 9,279), we developed an interpretable machine-learning pipeline in which standardisation and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) were embedded inside each fold of tenfold cross-validation to prevent data leakage. Six algorithms (Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), K-nearest neighbours, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) were compared on discrimination, calibration and decision-curve net benefit. XGBoost achieved the highest AUC-ROC (0.774, 95% CI 0.759-0.788); Random Forest showed the lowest Brier score (0.111), the calibration slope closest to unity (0.939) and the highest net benefit, and was retained for interpretation. Weighted-quantile-sum regression showed an inverse association between the antioxidant composite and comorbidity risk (OR per quantile 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95; P = 0.001). In mutually adjusted logistic regression, only magnesium retained an independent protective association (per 1 SD: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96; P = 0.016). SHAP identified theobromine (0.020) and lycopene (0.016) as leading protective contributors. Findings support targeted dietary-antioxidant strategies as candidate modifiable factors for cardiometabolic comorbidity prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.