ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a biomarker-enhanced arterial age model for young-to-middle-aged adults with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct vascular aging assessment is not always feasible in routine diabetes care. We aimed to derive a control-based arterial age reference using estimated pulse wave velocity, develop a biomarker-enhanced model for predicting arterial age gap, and evaluate its ability to identify accelerated arterial aging in young-to-middle-aged adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study included 300 participants (150 T2DM, 150 age- and sex-matched controls). Arterial age was derived from a control-group ePWV-age regression. Age gap was defined as estimated arterial age minus chronological age. Candidate predictors were evaluated using multivariable linear regression, and the final model was internally validated by 10-fold cross-validation. Compared with controls, participants with T2DM had higher ePWV, older estimated arterial age, larger age gap, lower adropin, and higher oxLDL (all p < 0.001). Accelerated arterial aging was more frequent in T2DM than controls (76.0% vs. 20.0%). The final model integrating HbA1c, adropin, and oxLDL explained 42% of the variance in age gap (adjusted R²=0.418), showed good discrimination for accelerated arterial aging (AUC 0.889; 95% CI 0.828-0.910), and retained acceptable internal calibration (slope 0.943). A biomarker-enhanced arterial age model integrating HbA1c, adropin, and oxLDL provided an interpretable framework for identifying accelerated arterial aging in young-to-middle-aged adults with T2DM. Although promising for translational implementation, external validation and direct pulse wave velocity benchmarking are required before clinical application. The model also enabled a three-level arterial aging classification and web-based implementation for research use, supporting its potential as a practical risk-communication tool prototype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.