ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning based histomorphological phenotyping and prognostic stratification for combined SCLC and LCNEC.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prognostic stratification for combined small and large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (cSCLC-LCNEC) remains challenging. We introduce GTBIS, an interpretable deep learning model for histomorphological phenotyping and prognostic stratification of cSCLC-LCNEC from pathology images. In multicenter cohorts (n = 670), GTBIS accurately differentiated SCLC from LCNEC. When applied to cSCLC-LCNEC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, GTBIS stratified them into subgroups with different prognoses. Patients in the favorable-prognosis subgroup (SCLC-like phenotype) exhibited significantly better five-year overall survival (100% vs. 39.5%) and disease-free survival (87.5% vs. 36.0%) than those in the poor-prognosis subgroup (LCNEC-like phenotype). Multivariable analysis confirmed GTBIS classification as a strong, independent prognostic factor. Multimodal interpretability analyses linked the favorable-prognosis phenotype to proliferative pathways, whereas the poor-prognosis phenotype to epithelial-mesenchymal transition, hypoxia, and metabolic reprogramming. In conclusion, GTBIS shows promise as a complementary histology-based tool for prognostic stratification, enabling more personalized management of cSCLC-LCNEC.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.