ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
CLCNet: a contrastive learning and chromosome-aware network for genomic prediction in plants.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing polyploidy for climate-resilient crops: Lessons from the evolutionary model, allotetraploid cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Review
- CLCNet: a contrastive learning and chromosome-aware network for genomic prediction in plants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MeNet: A mixed-effect deep neural network for multi-environment genomic prediction of agronomic traits.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection leverages genome-wide markers and phenotypes to predict breeding values, with its effectiveness largely dependent on the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) models. However, GP methods often struggle to capture inter-individual variability and are limited by the curse of dimensionality, where the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) far exceeds the sample size. To address these challenges, we present CLCNet (Contrastive Learning and Chromosome-aware Network), a novel deep learning framework that integrates contrastive learning and chromosome-aware feature modeling. CLCNet comprises two key components: (i) a contrastive learning module that enhances the model's ability to capture fine-grained, genotype-dependent phenotypic differences among individuals, and (ii) a chromosome-aware module that captures structured feature selection at both chromosome and genome levels, thereby distilling the most informative SNPs. We evaluated CLCNet across 4 crop species, covering 10 agronomically important traits, and compared it with a diverse set of classical linear, machine learning, and deep learning models. CLCNet achieved superior prediction performance, with statistically significant improvements in Pearson correlation coefficient, ranging from 0.34% to 12.19% over baseline, together with reduced mean squared error. Performance gains were more pronounced for traits with moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD; r2 = 0.21-0.36) and high heritability (h2 > 0.66), such as those in maize, rapeseed, and soybean. For cotton traits characterized by high LD (r2 = 0.74) and lower heritability (h2 < 0.50), CLCNet maintained robust performance without degradation. Overall, these results demonstrate that CLCNet is an effective framework for improving genomic prediction accuracy and holds strong potential for practical applications in plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.