ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Visual adaptation of a biting fly that permanently foregoes flight.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems are essential for behaviour, but energetically expensive. Selection favours accurate coding of pertinent stimuli and penalises excess functionality, but selective pressures can change over an organism's life. The dipteran superfamily Hippoboscoidea includes obligate blood-feeding flies with greatly varying ecologies, from fast-flying, free-living, visually oriented tsetse, to flightless, ectoparasitic, non-visual bat flies. Deer keds (Lipoptena andaluciensis, Diptera: Hippoboscidae) combine these lifestyles by flying to seek hosts based at least partly on vision, and then breaking off their wings to live as permanent ectoparasites. We use transcriptomics to understand evolutionary and developmental adaptations of the deer ked visual system to these dramatically varying selective pressures. We identified transcripts for five opsins, corresponding to the visual opsins of free-living tsetse. These included Rh1, Rh3, Rh5 and Rh6 of the compound eyes, comprising UV-, blue- and green-absorbing types serving colour and motion vision, and Rh2 of the ocelli, serving flight control. These opsins were still expressed in wingless, ectoparasitic adults but at significantly reduced levels, consistent with reduced investment in vision but not loss of any aspect of visual function. We speculate that limited plasticity in opsin expression may constrain visual adaptation to ectoparasitism, potentially imposing a long-term cost to foregoing flight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.