ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Transdermal drug delivery systems in cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional cancer therapies, particularly oral and intravenous chemotherapy, are frequently associated with systemic toxicity, non-specific drug distribution, fluctuating plasma concentrations, and limited patient compliance. These drawbacks have led to the development of alternative drug delivery strategies which aimed at improving therapeutic potency with minimized adverse effects. Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) have emerged as a promising non-invasive technology that possesses the ability to offer sustained and controlled drug release, avoiding first-pass metabolism, and reducing systemic exposure. In the context of cancer treatment, TDDS allows for localized drug delivery and optimized pharmacokinetic control, thereby enhancing therapeutic index. Recent formulation advancements in the area of polymeric patches, microneedles, nanoliposomes, lipid and polymeric nanoparticles, nanoemulsions and physical enhancement methods such as iontophoresis and electroporation have greatly improved skin permeability and drug stability. The application of nanotechnology has also enabled the development of targeted, stimulus-responsive, and immune-modulating delivery systems. Despite the challenges posed by skin barrier function, penetration of high molecular weight drugs, interpatient variability, and translational issues, ongoing preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate the growing promise of TDDS primarily in localized and superficial malignancies, such as melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, with systemic applications remaining largely at the preclinical stage. This review critically evaluates the existing formulation approaches, molecular mechanisms, clinical efficacy and future prospects of TDDS in cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42219404What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.