SynthesisBrain and behavior2026
Components and Delivery Formats of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveChronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent fatigue, impaired functioning, and substantial societal burden. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is commonly used for CFS/ME, the effective components and delivery formats remain unclear.
methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsyclNFO, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and major English and Chinese databases from inception to January 15, 2025, without language restrictions. Ultimately, a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) and component network meta-analysis (cNMA) of 16 randomized controlled trials were conducted to assess the associations between CBT components, delivery formats, and patient-important outcomes.
resultsAt the treatment level, guided self-help CBT (mean difference [MD], -6.89; 95% CI, -9.56 to -4.22; moderate certainty) and individual CBT (MD, -4.81; 95% CI, -6.98 to -2.65; moderate certainty) probably reduced fatigue when measured immediately after treatment. At the component level, goal setting (incremental mean difference [iMD], -8.83; 95% CI, -16.92 to -0.74), third-wave components (iMD, -6.02; 95% CI, -11.33 to -0.72), and cognitive restructuring (iMD, -4.41; 95% CI, -8.83 to 0.01) were associated with reduced fatigue when measured immediately after treatment. Psychoeducation was potentially counterproductive (iMD, 5.23; 95% CI, 0.64 to 9.82). At the end of follow-up, cognitive restructuring was associated with reduced fatigue and depression, and improved physical function; goal setting was also associated with improved physical function. The combination of goal setting, third-wave components, and cognitive restructuring delivered via guided self-help may be an efficacious component-based intervention relative to the nonspecific treatment component (iMD, -16.33; 95% CI, -26.68 to -5.99).
conclusionsThe effective CBT combination probably involves goal setting, third-wave components, and cognitive restructuring delivered via guided self-help, while psychoeducation may be detrimental. Future studies should prospectively examine core CBT components and their interactions, as well as incorporate measures of dose and intensity to guide more personalized and scalable interventions.
trial registrationCRD420251018083.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.