ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2026
Diagnosis-based pathways for conservative and minimally invasive management of temporomandibular disorders: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Aging and Its Impact on Surface Properties of Conventional and CAD-CAM Occlusal Splint Materials: An In Vitro Comparative Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) encompass a spectrum of musculoskeletal and joint conditions of the masticatory system that frequently lead to chronic pain, limited function, and reduced quality of life. Although conservative and minimally invasive approaches are recommended as first-line therapies, their comparative efficacy remains unclear.This scoping review mapped evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2015 and 2025 to identify diagnosis-based effective management pathways for TMDs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed databases for RCTs published within the last 10 years. Eligible studies included adult patients diagnosed with Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) or Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) categories and compared conservative or minimally invasive treatments reporting pain, function, or psychosocial outcomes. Data were extracted and charted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, and findings were organized into diagnosis-based intervention pathways reflecting first-line, adjunctive, and escalation therapies. A total of 129 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, revealing a stepwise treatment pathway across the diagnostic subtypes. Education, behavioral therapy, and exercise are the first-line management options that improve pain intensity and mandibular function. Splint therapy and other physical modalities can enhance pain modulation. Minimally invasive interventions for refractory cases provide various long-term benefits. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Maximum Mouth Opening (MMO) improvements were the primary outcomes, indicating pain relief and functional recovery as therapeutic endpoints. Overall, the evidence from the past decade supports a diagnosis-driven, stepwise model that emphasizes conservative multimodal care as the cornerstone of TMD management. Minimally invasive procedures should be reserved for persistent pain after optimized non-surgical therapy. Future RCTs should standardize diagnostic and outcome measures to strengthen evidence-based clinical pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.