ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Macrophage metabolic reprogramming in sepsis-associated acute lung injury: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-associated acute lung injury (S-ALI) remains a life-threatening condition with high mortality and limited therapeutic options. Macrophages, as key sentinels of innate immunity, exhibit remarkable heterogeneity and functional plasticity. These properties are fundamentally driven by metabolic reprogramming, which tailors their effector functions to specific microenvironmental demands. Beyond the traditional M1/M2 binary classification, macrophage activation is now appreciated as a continuous functional spectrum. Pro-inflammatory macrophages preferentially utilize aerobic glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway, coupled with suppressed oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), whereas reparative macrophages rely predominantly on OXPHOS and fatty acid oxidation (FAO). Key glycolytic enzymes such as PFKFB3 and PKM2, the transcriptional regulator HIF-1α, and TCA cycle intermediates including succinate and itaconate serve as critical metabolic checkpoints governing macrophage inflammatory responses. During S-ALI, the metabolic landscape undergoes dynamic temporal shifts: the early hyperinflammatory phase is characterized by enhanced glycolysis, while the late immunosuppressive phase exhibits impaired OXPHOS and FAO. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding how metabolic reprogramming orchestrates macrophage polarization during S-ALI, encompassing glycolysis, the TCA cycle, FAO, and amino acid metabolism. Natural compounds, pharmacological inhibitors, and innovative delivery platforms have shown promise in reprogramming macrophage metabolism to restore immune homeostasis. Notable examples include aerosolized CRISPR/Cas9 nanotherapeutics, biomimetic nanoplatforms, pH-responsive nanoparticles, and engineered exosomes. However, challenges such as broad cytotoxicity, limited macrophage selectivity, incomplete pharmacokinetic characterization, and the timing of intervention in the evolving septic milieu must be addressed. Future strategies should focus on developing cell-type-restricted delivery systems, validating targets in human-relevant models, and designing phase-specific interventions tailored to the metabolic trajectory of S-ALI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.