Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220535›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Adoptive cell therapies in solid tumors: current clinical landscape, challenges, and future directions.

Joe Rizkallah, Bahaa El Deen Wehbeh, Waseem Wassouf, Elio Salameh, Adnan Joumaa, Francois Jose Haddad, Lama Hamade, Nicole Charbel, Ghada M Bakri, Ali Awada and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joe RizkallahDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Bahaa El Deen WehbehDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Waseem WassoufDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elio SalamehDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Adnan JoumaaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Francois Jose HaddadFaculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lama HamadeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nicole CharbelDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghada M BakriDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali AwadaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Firas KreidiehDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has emerged as a transformative strategy in cancer immunotherapy, offering durable clinical benefit in hematologic malignancies and expanding therapeutic potential in solid tumors. However, the translation of ACT to solid malignancies remains constrained by biological, immunological, and logistical challenges. This narrative review provides an evidence based overview of the current clinical landscape of ACT in solid tumors, with a focus on chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T), tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), and T cell receptor-engineered T cell (TCR-T) therapies. We summarize recent clinical trial outcomes, highlight tumor-specific antigen targets, and examine key determinants of therapeutic efficacy across major solid tumor types. The review discusses central obstacles limiting ACT success in solid tumors, including antigen heterogeneity, immune evasion, inadequate T cell trafficking, limited persistence, and functional exhaustion within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Mechanisms driving treatment resistance, on-target off-tumor toxicity, and immune-related adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are critically evaluated. We further examine evolving strategies designed to overcome these barriers, including multi-antigen targeting, armored and logic-gated CAR designs, metabolic and cytokine engineering, locoregional delivery approaches, and next-generation manufacturing platforms incorporating allogeneic and gene-edited products. In parallel, the role of biomarkers, tumor microenvironment profiling, and personalized treatment selection is explored as a means to optimize patient stratification and enhance therapeutic outcomes. Advances in translational research, combination immunotherapy, and precision immuno-oncology are positioned as key drivers of the next phase of ACT development. By integrating mechanistic insights with emerging clinical evidence, this review outlines the progress, limitations, and future directions of ACT in solid tumors. It aims to provide a forward-looking framework to guide ongoing research, clinical trial design, and the rational implementation of adoptive cellular immunotherapies in solid malignancies.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-Cell ExhaustionT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigenadoptive cell therapycancer immunotherapyCAR-T cellsimmunoregulationsolid tumorsT cell receptor therapytumor-infiltrating lymphocytestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42220535
PMCPMC13215810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.