Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220644›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2026

Design and applications of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Yue Liu, Hao Zhang, Lingkun Zhang, Jianmin Han, Jian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue LiuTianjin Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology & Tianjin Key Laboratory of Oral Soft and Hard Tissues Restoration and Regeneration, No.12 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300070, PR China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310030, PR China.
Lingkun ZhangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310030, PR China.
Jianmin HanTianjin Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology & Tianjin Key Laboratory of Oral Soft and Hard Tissues Restoration and Regeneration, No.12 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300070, PR China.
Jian YangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310030, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the placement of millions of dental implants annually, one-quarter to one-half of cases require concurrent guided bone regeneration (GBR), where a recent meta-analysis of 100 studies reported an approximately 26% complication rate that exposes the structural and biological limits of current barrier membranes. Conventional collagen and PTFE-based membranes function predominantly as passive occlusive barriers, lacking the bioactivity, controllable degradation, and immunomodulatory capacity demanded by the dynamic alveolar microenvironment, in which up to 50% of ridge width can be lost within 12 months post-extraction. Addressing this gap requires reframing GBR membranes as programmable interfaces. This review presents a three-lens framework - alveolar-bone-specific osteoimmune biology, metabolically active and stimuli-responsive material platforms, and translational bottlenecks - to systematically chart the field. We synthesize recent advances across four next-generation material families (polymer composites, biodegradable Mg/Zn alloys, MXene-based systems, and citrate-based polymers), four hierarchical structural strategies (bilayer, Janus, gradient, and 4D-printed architectures), and complementary functionalization strategies that include surface chemistry tailoring, bioactive ion release, and stimuli-responsive triggers, explicitly mapping how each modulates mechanical retention, degradation kinetics, antibacterial activity, and macrophage M1-to-M2 polarization. We further evaluate the clinical performance of these material platforms in alveolar ridge augmentation and identify platform-specific post-market follow-up endpoints required for regulatory translation. Finally, we articulate six open mechanistic questions and a near-term agenda integrating artificial intelligence/machine learning-driven design, microfluidic oral-microenvironment models, and standardized large-animal alveolar protocols. This framework repositions GBR membranes toward programmable, osteoimmune-active regenerative platforms, charting an actionable path from bench to clinic.

Indexed as

Barrier membranesClinical translationGuided bone regenerationMaterial innovationStructural design

Identifiers

PMID42220644
PMCPMC13217894

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.