Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220744›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Assessment of Biomechanical Parameters and Their Correlation During Barefoot Walking and Arch-Building Gait in Plantar Fasciitis Using a Dynamic Gait Analysis System: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Banoth K Kumar, Shoibam Jenifa, Vineet T Abraham, Srikanth Muni, Purushotham Lingaiah, Timitrov P, Raunak Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Banoth K KumarPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Shoibam JenifaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Vineet T AbrahamOrthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Srikanth MuniOrthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Purushotham LingaiahOrthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Timitrov PNephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Raunak KumarPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain and is associated with significant functional limitation and reduced quality of life. Alterations in foot biomechanics and plantar pressure distribution are considered key contributors. Short foot exercises effectively strengthen intrinsic foot muscles, improve arch support, and dynamic stability. We can incorporate the arch-building gait as a short-foot exercise. This study aims to evaluate and compare biomechanical parameters and plantar forces at the forefoot, midfoot, and heel among individuals with unilateral and bilateral PF and healthy individuals, using a dynamic gait analysis system. Additionally, it analyses the correlations during barefoot walking and arch-building gait. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Mangalagiri, India, over 15 months. A total of 141 participants were included: 47 with unilateral PF, 47 with bilateral PF, and 47 healthy individuals. Gait analysis was performed using the Diers Formetric 4D system (DIERS, Biomedical Solutions, Germany) to assess biomechanical gait parameters, as well as plantar force distribution at the forefoot, midfoot, and heel during barefoot walking and arch-building gait. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA, the chi-square test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient, with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 141 participants were included, with 47 in each of the following groups: unilateral (U/L), bilateral (B/L), and normal. No significant differences in biomechanical gait parameters were observed among the groups during barefoot walking. In contrast, during arch-building gait, significant differences were present in cadence and antero-posterior (A/P) centre of pressure. For barefoot walking, a significant difference in midfoot plantar force was found between the unilateral and bilateral PF groups, whereas no significant differences emerged during arch-building gait. Strong-to-moderate positive correlations were observed between barefoot walking and arch-building gait parameters across all groups. Conclusion Individuals with unilateral and bilateral PF show near-normal gait during barefoot walking. Arch-building gait reveals subtle biomechanical changes and improves plantar load distribution. These findings support that the arch-building gait activates the intrinsic foot muscles and can serve as both a sensitive assessment tool and a potential rehabilitation strategy.

Indexed as

arch-building gaitbiomechanicsgait analysisplantar fasciitisplantar force

Identifiers

PMID42220744
PMCPMC13221788

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.