ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2026
Policy lessons regarding medical security for rare diseases inChina: Insights from Zhejiang Province through the multiplestreams framework.
Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases pose a persistent challenge to healthcare systems worldwide due to their low prevalence, high treatment costs, and rapid emergence of novel therapies. In China, while significant progress has been made through national rare disease lists and medical insurance negotiations, substantial medical security gaps remain at the subnational level. This Policy Forum examines the decade-long evolution of rare disease-specific medical security policies in Zhejiang Province (2015-2025) to draw broader lessons for designing sustainable and equitable coverage mechanisms under centralized insurance systems. Using the multiple streams framework (MSF) as an interpretive lens, this article puts forth three policy arguments. First, medical security for rare diseases cannot rely solely on basic medical insurance (BMI); instead, it requires institutional layering that combines insurance-based pooling, fiscal instruments, and social co-assistance. Second, in highly centralized governance contexts, policy entrepreneurship is predominantly state-embedded, with administrative agencies playing a decisive role in coupling problems, solutions, and political mandates. Third, policy innovation in relation to rare diseases is not a one-time event but an iterative process, in which each reform generates new problem definitions and policy windows. The Zhejiang experience demonstrates that under institutional constraints such as standardized benefit lists, local governments can achieve strategic innovation within the available institutional space by shifting their policy focus from reimbursing costs for "drugs on the Nationally Reimbursed Drug List (NRDL)" to targeted compensation for expenditures for drugs not on the NRDL. This pathway improves treatment affordability while maintaining fiscal sustainability, providing actionable insights for China and healthcare systems in other countries facing similar structural constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.