ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional risk tools often lack specificity for ICU acquired DVT. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for accurate DVT risk prediction in critically ill patients. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 2000 patients from two centers, partitioned into training, internal testing, and external validation sets. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm identified robust predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was utilized for model interpretability. Results: The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other ML algorithms and traditional tools (e.g. Caprini score). It achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.822-0.916) in training, 0.850 (95% CI: 0.801-0.900) in internal testing, and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.771-0.888) in external validation. SHAP analysis identified six dominant predictors: immobilization duration, D-dimer, femoral vein catheterization, APACHE II score, malignancy, and age. The RF model successfully captured non-linear interactions, particularly exponential risk increases from prolonged immobilization and elevated D-dimer. DCA demonstrated a higher net clinical benefit than default strategies. Conclusion: Integrating six readily available clinical variables, the RF model offers a robust and interpretable tool for DVT risk stratification, outperforming traditional scores. To facilitate real-world clinical application, an accessible web-based calculator is being developed to guide early, personalized thromboprophylaxis in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.