Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221607›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

Community-based interventions to support aging in place and functional independence in older adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Adnan Kisa, Sezer Kisa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adnan KisaSchool of Health Sciences, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Sezer KisaNursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the global population ages, ensuring the autonomy and wellbeing of older adults living at home has become increasingly important. Supporting independence is central to aging in place, which requires access to appropriate health and social resources. In this context, community-based public health interventions may play an important role in addressing physical, cognitive, and psychosocial challenges associated with aging. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials examining community-based public health interventions that promote independence among older adults and to identify key components associated with successful aging in place. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted, including 91 publications representing 85 independent randomized controlled trials, retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Community-based public health interventions were defined as structured programs delivered in non-institutional settings to support health, functional ability, and autonomy among community-dwelling older adults. Data extraction included intervention characteristics, outcomes related to independence, and levels of community engagement. Outcomes were categorized as primary independence measures (e.g., ADL/IADL performance, disability status), functional capacity proxies (e.g., gait speed, balance), and psychosocial enablers of independence (e.g., self-efficacy, depressive symptoms) to support interpretive clarity. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for randomized controlled trials. Findings were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results: Across 91 publications representing 85 independent randomized controlled trials, 45% of publications were classified as low risk of bias, 31% as moderate, and 24% as high. Community-based interventions such as physical activity programs, cognitive and psychological support, multidomain models, nutrition interventions, social engagement initiatives, and rehabilitation strategies were generally associated with improvements in direct and indirect independence-related outcomes, including functional ability, mobility, cognitive performance, mental well-being, and social participation, although the magnitude and consistency of effects varied across intervention types and outcome domains. Interventions integrating multiple components and tailored delivery formats were frequently associated with improvements in functional outcomes and psychosocial enablers related to independence. Conclusion: Community-based public health interventions that address the multidimensional needs of older adults may support the maintenance of functional ability and independence in later life. Structured, scalable models that integrate physical, cognitive, and social components may strengthen aging-in-place strategies and inform future public health planning. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024596045. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024596045).

Indexed as

AgingAging in PlaceCommunity Health ServicesIndependent LivingActivities of Daily LivingAgedHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicaging in placecommunity-based interventionshealthy agingindependenceolder adultspublic health

Identifiers

PMID42221607
PMCPMC13219341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.