Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Total factor productivity growth and spatial-temporal evolution of China's health system: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist approach.

Yutong Yan, Pengcheng Wang, Yurui Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yutong YanSchool of Digital Economics and Trade, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengcheng WangSchool of Digital Economics and Trade, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou, China.
Yurui GuoSchool of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the deepening of healthcare reform in China has raised high demands for the accurate measurement of hospital total factor productivity (TFP), where existing systems often overstate performance by neglecting social welfare. This study constructs a novel evaluation framework incorporating medical quality and safety, analyzing input-output data from 31 Chinese provinces (2012-2022) using a three-stage DEA-Malmquist model under traditional and improved scenarios. It identifies significant divergence between the two perspectives and reveals the impact of external shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic. The core findings are that TFP is markedly overestimated by conventional methods, the Technological Progress (TC) index is the primary driver of this decline, and the pandemic has exposed systemic vulnerabilities by interrupting technological momentum. Future research and policy practice should focus on coordinating the deployment of medical technology with its broader social impacts, clarifying the pathways for high-quality development, and promoting regular TFP assessments that incorporate undesirable outputs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareEfficiency, OrganizationalChinaHealth Care ReformHumansSARS-CoV-2Spatio-Temporal AnalysisChinese hospitalMalmquist index approachthree-stage DEA modeltotal factor productivityundesirable outputs

Identifiers

PMID42221646
PMCPMC13216215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.