ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Total factor productivity growth and spatial-temporal evolution of China's health system: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the deepening of healthcare reform in China has raised high demands for the accurate measurement of hospital total factor productivity (TFP), where existing systems often overstate performance by neglecting social welfare. This study constructs a novel evaluation framework incorporating medical quality and safety, analyzing input-output data from 31 Chinese provinces (2012-2022) using a three-stage DEA-Malmquist model under traditional and improved scenarios. It identifies significant divergence between the two perspectives and reveals the impact of external shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic. The core findings are that TFP is markedly overestimated by conventional methods, the Technological Progress (TC) index is the primary driver of this decline, and the pandemic has exposed systemic vulnerabilities by interrupting technological momentum. Future research and policy practice should focus on coordinating the deployment of medical technology with its broader social impacts, clarifying the pathways for high-quality development, and promoting regular TFP assessments that incorporate undesirable outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.