Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Association of low-calorie sweetened product consumption and intakes of free sugar and dietary patterns in UK adults: a national study from 2008 to 2019.

Mathuramat Seesen, Kiara Chang, Christopher Millett, Fernanda Rauber, Renata B Levy, Mathilde Touvier, Edward W Gregg, Eszter P Vamos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathuramat SeesenPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kiara ChangPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher MillettPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fernanda RauberCentre for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata B LevyCentre for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mathilde TouvierUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, INRAE, CNAM, Center of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Bobigny, France.
Edward W GreggDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Eszter P VamosPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence on the effects of low- and no-calorie sweetened (LCS) product consumption on overall dietary patterns remains limited, despite their frequent promotion as healthier alternatives. This study assessed the association between LCS product consumption and both the levels and temporal trends in free sugar intake and overall dietary patterns among UK adults. Methods: Annual cross-sectional data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) from 2008/09 to 2018/19 were analyzed. Adults aged ≥18 years ( Results: In 2008/09, 45.9% of participants consumed LCS products, and this proportion remained stable over the 11-year period. Among LCS product consumers, the median LCS product intake increased significantly from 132.0 g/d in 2008/09 to 170.0 g/d in 2018/19. In the No-LCS group, free sugar and energy intakes decreased by -1.0 g/d (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.6) and -6.7 kcal/d (95% CI, -11.4 to -2.1) per year, respectively, with similar declines observed for the High-LCS group. In 2008/09, the mean water and minimally processed food consumption was lower in the High-LCS than the No-LCS group, by -141.2 g/d (95% CI, -203.8 to -78.6) and -306.3 g/d (95% CI, -359.5 to -216.7), respectively, and this difference persisted throughout the study period. Discussion: LCS consumption does not appear to align with potentially beneficial dietary patterns regarding free sugar, ultra-processed food and beverage, and minimally processed food and beverage intakes. These findings underline the importance of policies to consider overall dietary patterns that also address LCS consumption alongside reducing free sugar intake.

Indexed as

dietary patternsdietary trendsfree sugar intakelow- and no-calorie sweetened productsUK adultsultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID42221779
PMCPMC13215840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.