ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Monitoring plant moisture content and optimizing irrigation prescriptions based on UAV multimodal data.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the continuous advancement of smart agriculture, multi-modal remote sensing based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers new technical approaches for monitoring and managing crop moisture in fields. However, significant challenges remain in developing high-precision field-scale crop Plant Moisture Content (PMC) prediction models and translating them into actionable irrigation strategies. Methods: This study focuses on winter wheat, employing field experiments with PMC and water use efficiency (WUE) as indicators of crop water status. Vegetation indices (VIs) derived from UAV data were used to construct a leaf area index (LAI) inversion model. Crop Height was extracted from oblique photogrammetry point cloud data. By combining the Penman-Monteith equation with dual crop coefficients, an improved evapotranspiration (ET) model was developed, utilizing multispectral data from UAVs, thermal infrared data, point cloud-derived plant height, and LAI inversion results. Further utilizing VIs, temperature indices (TIs), and machine learning algorithms (Random Forest Regression (RFR), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), we established PMC prediction models for winter wheat at different growth stages. These models, integrated with WUE, form the basis for an irrigation scheduling optimization framework at the field scale. Results: Results indicate that VIs, the difference between canopy temperature and air temperature (ΔT), Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI), and ET exhibit varying correlations with PMC during three critical growth stages of winter wheat, with ET showing the highest correlation during the jointing and heading stages (absolute correlation coefficient |r| ≥ 0.639). Compared to PMC prediction models constructed with different combinations of VIs, ET, VIs+ET, and VIs+TIs, the model employing the RFR algorithm with multimodal inputs (VIS+TIs+ET) demonstrated the best performance. The model's predictive accuracy gradually improved across all growth stages, peaking during the grain-filling stage, with the coefficient of determination(R Discussion: The study suggests that stage-specific irrigation scheduling based on PMC thresholds can improve overall water use efficiency. This study shows that integrating multi-modal UAV data with machine learning and an improved ET model enables high-precision PMC monitoring, supporting data-driven irrigation scheduling in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.