ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Management of femoral large-bore access and closure during microaxial flow pump-supported interventions.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microaxial flow pump (mAFP) is increasingly employed for hemodynamic support in both cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI). However, its implantation requires large-bore arterial access, which carries a substantial risk of vascular complications, translating into higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Optimizing outcomes depends on safe vascular access and effective closure strategies. Ultrasound- and angiography-guided puncture, often complemented by advanced imaging, enhance the safety of femoral access. In the HR-PCI setting, pre-closure techniques are generally feasible and advisable as a prophylactic strategy. Conversely, in CS patients, where pre-closure is frequently not achievable, post-closure techniques during mAFP removal play a pivotal role. This review provides a contemporary, practical framework to manage femoral large-bore access and closure in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support with mAFP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.